Lighttpd vs nginx benchmark
WebMay 30, 2014 · Nginx was built with performance and efficiency in mind. It is incredibly efficient, even with thousands of connections. So, I would recommend, between the two (Apache and Nginx), Nginx. Lighttpd is well known for serving static content. Nginx is a good option for dynamic (php) pages. WebNginx is more popular and under more active maintenance. Both have Windows versions, or did, which was surprisingly useful at times: we could use Nginx as a local reverse-proxy front-end for IIS, or developers who use Windows could develop rewrite rules locally if they wanted. DigitalDefenestrator • 3 yr. ago I'd stick with nginx these days.
Lighttpd vs nginx benchmark
Did you know?
WebLighttpd uses less resources because of the way it runs. Apache can run in either a forked mode, creating a new process for every request, or in a threaded mode, where each request runs in a thread in a couple of processes. In lighttpd, there is a single process and it uses an event-loop, using epoll ()/kqueue () to process requests. WebJan 23, 2010 · Sorted by: 10 Both have pretty excellent performance. Using FastCGI with …
WebSep 2, 2008 · But back to the webservers: I found benchmarks that measured LightHTTPd and Apache, and some Apache-Nginx comparisons, but nothing that did all three, or compared Apache used in combination with ... WebApr 25, 2024 · The reason why Apache is considered to be slower than Nginx in most of the cases is its repetitive configuration. Apache checks .htaccess file resides within the content directories. This helps in decentralized configuration but processing requests take a lot more time than it is the case with Nginx.
WebJan 4, 2013 · Benchmark: Apache2 vs. Lighttpd (Images) This benchmark shows how … WebApr 15, 2024 · I don't think there will be much difference with dynamic content, since nginx and lighttpd and cherokee all use FastCGI or UNIX sockets. So on that side its pretty much the same. Static files seems to be a good match to nginx. For me I prefer nginx over Cherokee due to experience with it.
Web1 nginx has better usage coverage in more websites categories. Including Computers …
http://www.lighttpd.net/benchmark/ ticketmaster cyclones ticketsWebDec 20, 2012 · although Litespeed static file serving easily matches Nginx just Nginx is free. when i mean heavy PHP intensive sites = 2,000 to 13,000 php requests/second. 6x apache web servers load balanced OR. 4x nginx/php-fpm web servers load balanced (php-fpm bottleneck - most php-fpm folks scale out adding more php-fpm nodes to handle the extra … the lion king broadway makeup nycWebMain Difference Lighttpd and Ngnix are open source HTTP servers. Both of the Lighttpd and Nginx are fast and lightweight. These are asynchronous servers in which the Nginx uses only few megabytes of RAM while Apache consume hundreds of megabytes. Lighttpd has support for IPv6 whereas IPv6 support for Ngnix is under process. ticketmaster czech republicWebThe only place where I can even imagine substantial criticism is performance, since Nginx … the lion king broadway factsWebOct 26, 2009 · Does anyone have any benchmarks on how Hiawatha compares in speed and concurrent connections to Apache, Nginx, Lighttpd, Cheroke ? It would be great if someone for example installed Wordpress with Hiawatha and test the speed of the content served and maximum concurrent connections it can handle, then test Wordpress on Apache then … ticketmaster cyber weekWeblighttpd + async file-io gets into the range of Apache2 The problem with the blocking file-IO is that a single-threaded server can do nothing else while it is waiting for a syscall to finish. Benchmarks Running the http_load against different backends shows the impact of async-io vs. sync-io. 100k files the lion king broadway historyWebWhen comparing Nginx vs Lighttpd, the Slant community recommends Nginx for most … Nginx, Apache, and Caddy are probably your best bets out of the 14 options … the lion king broadway costumes